Governance Working Group
Record
Governance Meeting — Fifth Session
Vote item closed; all-channels community message agreed; governance department retired in favour of the working group; the organisational-design consultation designed — questions first, then surveys, coordinator interviews and the ALM as the decision point — with role definitions to precede any board-seat invitation.
Present: Celine V (facilitator), Daniel T, Anna T, Pablo V
Governance Meeting — Fourth Session
The group settles its own status under the working-group framework and prepares to register; ranked-pairs voting method reviewed for the event-dates decision; board-role and coordinator-role questions headed to the ALM as structured workshops.
Present: Celine V (facilitator), Daniel T, Anna T
Governance Meeting — Third Session
A substantive debate on a draft regulation for creating working groups surfaced the group’s deepest open question: does legitimacy come from a written mandate, or from direct engagement with the community? Agreed next step: gather input from the leads on both options.
Present: Celine V (facilitator), Daniel T, Kate B, Anna T, Ben D, Julian, Peter K, Olivier (listening)
Governance Meeting — Second Session
Three new participants join the five from the first meeting. Central outcome: a proposal to be drafted asking the board to formally establish the working group; the group’s transparency commitment is agreed.
Present: Celine V (facilitator), Daniel T, Kate B, Anna T, Chris O, Ben D, Peter K, Julian
Governance Meeting — First Session
The first informal governance meeting, convened to begin designing the association’s distributed decision-making structures — an interim group bootstrapped with board authority, with the intention of opening its composition to the community as quickly as possible.
Present: Kate B (facilitator), Daniel T, Celine V, Julian, Ben D